Menu

Every article is produced by our automated newsroom. How this works

Production · Global

INC’s March 2025 country forecast table was not one common yardstick

The March review put South Africa, Australia and Kenya into one in-shell table, but the rows were not directly comparable. South Africa appeared at two stated moisture bases, Australia at 3.5%, and Kenya with no moisture percentage. That distinction changes how buyers and analysts should read both the opening forecasts and the later results.

By Mac Daily NewsroomPublished · Updated · Event · Compiled
From the archive
Painted offset corners of blank ivory and russet paper on a dark green ground; a qualitative alignment metaphor without data.

The International Nut and Dried Fruit Council dated the review 13 March 2025 and said its information was prepared between mid-January and mid-March. The country notes show that this was a compilation of industry inputs: the South African estimate was attributed to Macadamias South Africa, while the Australian estimate was attributed to the Australian Macadamia Society. A new publisher did not turn those underlying figures into independent measurements.

For South Africa, the review gave 93,588 metric tonnes in shell at 1.5% moisture and the equivalent presentation of 95,500 tonnes at 3.5%. The earlier Mac Daily account incorrectly labelled 95,500 tonnes as a 10% figure. Later reporting by The Macadamia said SAMAC’s forecast had been cut to 85,166 tonnes from 93,433 tonnes at the start of the year. That later article does not state a moisture basis for either number, and its opening comparator differs from INC’s 93,588-ton line. It supports a downward forecast revision; it does not support a like-for-like percentage calculation or the previously stated 81,660-ton closed result.

Australia provides the clean comparison. INC recorded the opening estimate at 56,890 tonnes in shell at 3.5% moisture. On 26 March, AMS revised that to 55,960 tonnes at 3.5%, also presenting the same forecast as 60,000 tonnes at 10%. Its December release put the final crop at 43,800 tonnes at 3.5%, or 46,940 tonnes at 10%, based on actual factory receipts from handler members plus estimated production for non-members. Against the opening 3.5% estimate, the final crop was 13,090 tonnes lower, a 23.0% shortfall. That is Mac Daily’s calculation: (43,800 − 56,890) ÷ 56,890 × 100.

For Kenya, INC forecast 47,500 tonnes and described the number only as “in-shell basis”. It did not provide a moisture percentage in that country note. A later USDA Foreign Agricultural Service report showed a 47,000-tonne 2025 estimate sourced to AFA and FAS Nairobi, but it too was labelled as an estimate and did not supply a moisture basis for the plotted production figure. The 500-tonne difference therefore is not presented here as a measured forecast miss or a final outcome.

The practical rule is simple: retain the origin, status and moisture basis beside every national figure. Forecasts cannot be treated as final receipts; differently based in-shell tonnages cannot be compared as if they were normalized; and multiple articles repeating one association’s number do not create multiple independent observations.

From the archive: the review belongs to 13 March 2025. This account was first compiled on 31 August 2026 and corrected in September 2026. The lead image is an AI-generated conceptual illustration of moisture-basis comparison, not a measurement display or evidence of any orchard or harvest.

Corrections

  • materialOrigin not recorded

    South Africa’s 95,500-ton INC presentation is labelled at 3.5%; the later 85,166-ton number remains a basis-unstated forecast; Australia is compared at 3.5%; and Kenya’s estimate status and missing moisture percentage are explicit. The existing slug, publication dates, original media and prior record remain protected by the revision transaction and audit history.

    Previously: The archive account labelled South Africa’s 95,500-ton presentation at 10% moisture and asserted an 81,660-ton closed result without a bound source or comparable basis.

    Sources
  • minorPublisher correction

    Replace the old lead with reviewed, disclosed conceptual artwork while preserving original article prose, dates, citations and claim evidence. These historical source facts were not newly reverified.

    Previously: The archive lead image predates the owner’s revised image brief.

Sources

  1. International Nut and Dried Fruit Council — Macadamias Global Statistical Reviewinc.nutfruit.org · published · retrieved
  2. Australian Macadamia Society — Australian macadamia industry spared from wide-spread cyclone impact, with minimal crop forecast adjustmentaustralianmacadamias.org · published · retrieved
  3. Australian Macadamia Society — 2025 Australian macadamia crop finalised following challenging seasonaustralianmacadamias.org · published · retrieved
  4. The Macadamia — Mac prices buoyant amid supply squeezethemacadamia.co.za · published · retrieved
  5. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service — Trade Alert - Kenya Implements Seasonal Restrictions on Macadamia Harvesting and Exportsapps.fas.usda.gov · published · retrieved

Spotted an error? Request a correction · Every correction is logged publicly. · Corrections policy